Broader goal
How can memory-management policy preserve responsiveness when RAM is constrained?
Evidence to date
Controlled reruns show PSI before material swap growth, and a corrected canary records pressure-related responsiveness degradation. A three-host V5 study found that cgroup-memory growth rate identifies the tested moderate pressure regime about five seconds before PSI-only qualification and falls back cleanly under gradual pressure; earlier activation did not consistently outperform static zram.
V1–V5 established early PSI/swap ordering, a valid responsiveness measure, compression sensitivity, and a reliable rate classifier with an inconclusive performance result. Research is ongoing. The evidence does not establish one globally beneficial guided-zram policy: static zram was best in the focused moderate/structured comparison, gradual/random outcomes were host-dependent, and activation timing alone is insufficient to explain responsiveness.